top of page
Search

Protection of Whistleblowers: The OECD follows in the footsteps of the OMSAC

  • Writer: omsac actualités
    omsac actualités
  • Sep 28, 2023
  • 3 min read

Switzerland in the crosshairs for its weak anti-corruption system

Switzerland, long perceived as a bastion of neutrality and stability in Europe, today finds itself in the spotlight of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) due to its deficit in the protection of whistleblowers. , particularly in the private sector. The OECD, like the World Organization for Anti-Corruption Security (OMSAC), believes that Switzerland must take urgent measures to strengthen its whistleblower protection system and intensify its fight against corruption.


The Swiss Council of States recently adopted a motion, initiated by Ruedi Noser of the Radical Liberal Party (PLR), aimed at relaunching the debate on the protection of whistleblowers in the private sector. This decision comes only two years after the failure of a Swiss Federal Council project in this area. Members of the Swiss Parliament have recognized the need to strengthen rules to effectively protect people who dare to denounce corruption and reprehensible practices within companies.


The OECD is increasingly criticizing Switzerland for its weak anti-corruption system and its lack of adherence to two specific recommendations: the protection of whistleblowers in the private sector and the increase in the maximum penalty provided for. by law in cases of corruption. Switzerland today finds itself isolated in Europe by not having a binding legal framework for the protection of whistleblowers, while many European countries have already put such measures in place.


OMSAC, an independent global organization specializing in the fight against corruption and the protection of whistleblowers, has long drawn attention to the situation in Switzerland. In 2021, the OMSAC had already denounced the lack of binding measures to protect whistleblowers and had highlighted that Switzerland was poorly ranked in the world ranking for the fight against corruption.


Ruedi Noser, author of the motion, insists that Switzerland can no longer afford to lag behind when it comes to protecting whistleblowers. He believes that strengthening the rules is necessary to detect earlier cases of corruption which also exist in the Swiss economy.


However, the road to political consensus in Switzerland does not yet seem to be mapped out. Parliament had previously rejected the Federal Council's draft on whistleblowers, arguing that it would not guarantee real protection to the workers concerned. The plan called for a three-tiered cascade structure, including requiring the employee to first report problems to the employer, then to an authority, and as a last resort, to the public.


Thomas Minder, member of the Swiss Parliament, is in favor of better protection for whistleblowers, but is opposed to a revision of the sanctions regime. Nevertheless, despite heated debates, Swiss senators approved both the motion aimed at strengthening the protection of whistleblowers and the one advocating increased sanctions for companies. The National Council will still have to decide on these questions.


The head of the Federal Department of Justice and Police, Elisabeth Baume-Schneider, stressed the importance of taking concrete measures to fight corruption. She said Switzerland should report on legislative progress by the end of 2024. In the absence of significant progress, the OECD could consider sending a high-level mission to Switzerland. International pressure is intensifying, and Switzerland is now under observation in the European context.


This delicate situation in Switzerland highlights the crucial importance of protecting whistleblowers in the fight against corruption on a global scale. OMSAC, which works tirelessly to promote transparency and integrity, fully supports efforts to strengthen the protection of whistleblowers in Switzerland and around the world.


OMSAC Press & Media Department

 
 
 

Comments

Clause de responsabilité et portée juridique

Nos rapports et enquêtes sont fondées sur des informations accessibles, des recoupements factuels et des analyses professionnelles. Elles ne constituent en aucun cas des enquêtes judiciaires, policières ou administratives, ni des décisions de justice.

Conformément aux statuts de l’OMSAC, nos missions officielles sont la lutte contre la corruption, la criminalité, le trafic d’influence, la fuite des capitaux, le blanchiment d’argent, la défense des droits de l’homme, la traite des êtres humains, l’immigration clandestine et la protection de la liberté d’expression à l’échelle mondiale.

L’OMSAC mène ses propres enquêtes et investigations. Lorsqu’elle reçoit des informations ou des alertes, celles-ci sont analysées, étudiées et expertisées par le Département Intégrité et Investigations, en coordination avec le Département Juridique. Selon la gravité et la nature des faits constatés, ces départements décident de la transmission des dossiers aux institutions sécuritaires ou judiciaires compétentes du pays concerné. À partir de ce point, la mission de l’OMSAC prend fin.

L’OMSAC n’est ni une autorité de poursuite, ni un organe juridictionnel, ni un service de police ou de renseignement. Les constats, opinions et conclusions exprimés sur ces pages ne sauraient être assimilés à des accusations pénales, à des jugements de culpabilité ou à des décisions judiciaires. Toute responsabilité pénale, disciplinaire ou administrative relève exclusivement des institutions légalement compétentes, conformément au droit national et international applicable.

Les personnes ou entités mentionnées sur ces pages bénéficient pleinement de la présomption d’innocence et des droits fondamentaux garantis par le droit international. Ces documents ont pour unique objectif de contribuer au débat public, à la transparence institutionnelle et à l’amélioration de la gouvernance, dans le strict respect des cadres légaux et des normes internationales.

READ MORE
bottom of page